logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.21 2018고정394
방문판매등에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00, Defendant B, C, and D by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

Defendant

A. A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) is a multi-level marketing company established for the purpose of selling health food wholesale and retail business, etc. Defendant B is a representative director E with interest of representative director D, and Defendant C is the president of the Korea Site E with interest on the attached table of D.

1. Defendant A

A. Although a person who intends to act as a multi-level salesman is required to register with and act as a multi-level salesman, the Defendant was not registered as a multi-level salesman from the office of the 8th floor D of Seoul FF building from around November 2016 to March 24, 2017, and was engaged in multi-level salesman activities, such as managing subordinate salespersons or customers, without being registered as a multi-level salesman from D’s 8th floor D office of Seoul FF building from around March 2016

(b) No multi-level seller shall inform false or exaggerated facts or induce anyone to make school transactions by using fraudulent means;

Nevertheless, at the time and time as described in the above paragraph A, the Defendant would establish an online marketing company called "G" within the speed as soon as possible in China’s private country E and its customers and would be listed in the U.S. in 2020. When purchasing D products equivalent to 1,500BV (3550,000 won) at the time of listing “G”, the Defendant would have the right to exchange shares of 1,500 shares to be purchased at 0.01 shares per one share (12 won) and 4,50BV (107 million won) to be listed at 1,00 shares to be purchased at 1,50 shares to be listed at 0.12 shares to 0.5 shares to be purchased at 15 million shares to be listed at 1,00 shares.

Publicity was promoted.

However, the fact that the company "G" was not clear, and there was no actual result, and whether it was listed or whether it was listed.

As a result, the defendant knows false or exaggerated facts or uses fraudulent methods.

arrow