beta
Text
Defendant
A Fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 4 months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 6 months, and Defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendants are those who work for day duty and have been aware of each other, and have been customers in the "Galla" operated by the victim F (57 years of age) in Incheon Gyeyang-gu.
1. On August 2017, Defendants D and C conspired to take money from the victims by taking advantage of the fact that sexual traffic is possible in the above multiples operated by the victim (the age of 56 at that time), and by threatening the police to give money to the victims and report sexual traffic, and by threatening the victims to report sexual traffic.
Pursuant to the contents of the Defendants’ invitation as above, around 12:00 on August 16, 2017, Defendant C visited the above tea to the victim and had sexual intercourse with the victim, and reported to the police the fact of engaging in sexual traffic if the victim did not know 2 million won in return for reporting the sexual relation to the victim, and Defendant D told Defendant C to the effect that the victim would be able to make a report on the fact of engaging in sexual traffic without knowing 2 million won in return for reporting it to the victim. Defendant D would make a fright up for the amount, etc. with Defendant C’s act, and delivered it to the Defendant C after receiving 1.3 million won from the victim who was frighted to the Defendants’ act.
As a result, the Defendants received the property by jointly threatening the victim.
2. Defendant D and Defendant A conspired to borrow money from the victim on or around November 2017 by means of the aforementioned method, and Defendant A visited the said multiples around November 13:10, 2017, and made a sexual intercourse with the victim at around 50,00 won, and reported the fact of sexual traffic to the police at the end of the sexual relationship with the victim. Defendant D had the victim go to withdraw money from the victim who was frighted with the victim, stating that “I would have to conduct internal arbitration.” However, Defendant D had the victim make a report on sexual traffic.