1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. For each real estate listed in the separate sheet added in the trial.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, the designated parties, and the Defendants (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”) entered into reconstruction agreements between the Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as “the Plaintiffs”), and the Defendants were the owners of T Lease, a building on the ground of Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D (hereinafter referred to as “former Building”).

around June 2003, the plaintiffs and the defendants agreed to remove the old building and newly construct two divided houses of 18 households on the ground (hereinafter "the loan of this case"), and concluded a construction contract with E and the construction business operator to enable E to undertake the construction work.

Secondly, the Plaintiffs and the Defendants drafted an agreement to specify the reconstruction agreement on October 2004. The agreement provides that ① the Plaintiffs and 11 Defendants remove the old building and complete the partitioned building of 18 households, respectively, with respect to the 11 household units after completion of the registration of their respective preservation of ownership, and set off the registration of transfer to the specific persons designated by E, a construction business operator, with respect to the remaining 7 household units.

② All taxes and public charges incurred in the construction of the loan of this case shall be equally divided.

③ The rebuilding of this case included a statement that KRW 17,160,000 shall be deposited into an account opened by F and I two persons.

B. E, a construction business operator of the instant loan change of a construction business operator, was awarded a subcontract for each part of the instant loan construction work, such as J and U, by dividing the instant mold construction work, window mold construction, glass construction, and sculpture construction work, and notified the Plaintiffs and the Defendants of the transfer on August 17, 2006.

C. Around October 2006, disputes between the Plaintiffs, Defendants, and construction business operators were completed. Since the settlement of construction cost between the Plaintiffs, Defendants, and construction business operators and their subcontractors has not been completed, subcontractors from July 2007.