Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Defendant

The instant public prosecution against B is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Changwon District Court’s branch on October 19, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 15, 2017, and is still under the suspended sentence period. Defendant A was found not guilty of special injury at the Busan District Court on October 25, 2017 and continues the trial of the case.

[2] On March 6, 2017, at around 07:15, Defendant A and B met together in the D restaurant located in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and the above Defendant 1 suffered injury to B by carrying a dangerous object, such as her head part at one time and her face face part at one time, and her face part at one time in a main food, and her head part at two times, which is a dangerous object. Defendant A and B suffered injury to B for treatment days, with the face part of the above Defendant’s face part at one time. Defendant B suffered injury, such as her face part at one cm and her face part at one cm, and caused injury to B, such as tearing.

Therefore, the above defendant was a special injury crime against B, and B was prosecuted and tried at the Busan District Court on March 28, 2017 due to the above defendant's injury to B, and the above defendant was at the same time under the Busan District Court on March 28, 2017, and the above defendant was at the suspension of execution, and there was no concern that the sentence of suspension of execution would be invalidated because the defendant committed a special injury serious under the statutory penalty even during the suspension of execution

“To make a false testimony to the effect that “......”

Accordingly, if the Defendant appeared as a witness to B in the court at the front of the Busan East-gu E Center on September 2017, 2017, the Defendant did not have any fact that he was suffering from beer, and there was no fact that he was priceed as beer disease.

“At the request of testimony to the effect that the testimony was “,” and had B make a false testimony.