Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 3, 2013 at night by the Cheongju District Court for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years; and (b) the judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 22:00 on November 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) took the clothes of “F” in the operation of the Victim E in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun; (b) took advantage of the key of the above clothes which was stolen in advance, opened the clothes and went into the gate; and (c) returned the fire alarm devices equivalent to KRW 80,000 at the market price installed in the above gate to his hand; and (d) took two shorts of CCTV DVR (recording devices) equivalent to KRW 495,000 at the market price to take the screen in his hand, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement that "the defendant recognizes the damage of the fire alarm device"

1. The defendant's partial statement and statement in G and E among the suspect examination protocol on the defendant by the prosecution;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A written estimate, CCTV video recording (Evidence No. 5) dated November 8, 2012, a copy of a investigation report (No. 10) (No. 10), CCTV DVR damage and replacement confirmation on the CCTV recording area as of November 8, 2012,

1. Previous convictions in the Supreme Court Decision 2013Da607 Decided Cheongju District Court Decision 2013Ma607 Decided the Cheongju District Court Decision [the following circumstances recognized by the above evidence, i.e., the fact that the Defendant was suspended from CCTV screen immediately after the Defendant moved to a blind spot with CCTV DVR (Evidence No. 5 and 108 pages of investigation records), the above CCTV screen is protruding a fixed part of the recording device and suspended from pluging a power source. Even if the Defendant did not have physical force, it is almost little if the Defendant naturally fell (No. 99,203 pages of investigation records, and the CCTV screen was limited to the Defendant inside the clothes at the time of suspension of the CCTV screen, and there was no other external reason to destroy a part of the connection. In full view of the fact that the Defendant was not identified by the fact that two parts of the above recording device are damaged.