Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of D, and Defendant B is the chairman of E Building Management Body.

At around 14:00 on November 26, 2015, Defendants and F unilaterally cancelled the building management contract with (State)G, which is the existing controlled entity of the E building, and decided to correct the management office in the G and recover the keys from December 1, 2015 to (State operated by Defendant A, a new controlled entity, to be responsible for the management of the said building.

Accordingly, at around 11:00 on November 27, 2015, Defendant A visited the first floor management office of the E-building, which is managed by the Government of the Republic of Korea (State), and opened the entrance, and corrected the key of the management office by H, the head of the management office scheduled to succeed to employment, and opened the key to Defendant B.

Defendant

B After receiving the keys of the management office from Defendant A, I tried to verify whether the office of management office of the first floor was properly corrected, which is the head of the G, and he left the said key to the office of general secretary of the building management office.

After that, I, the director of G, opened the door of the management office and asked the defendants to request several keyss, but the defendants refused to comply with the request. At around 16:30 on the same day, I reported in 112 that “the tenants interfere with their business without returning to the office of management,” and that “the tenants interfere with their business without returning to the office of management” was called by the police officer, but the keys was not returned to the police officer on November 28, 2015, and the (ju)G employees interfered with the management of the victim’s building by making it impossible for them to enter the office of management.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to obstruct the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements (in the second date);

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement concerning I and H;

1. Statement of the police with J 1.