logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.09.17 2015고단644
공무집행방해등
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 21:30 on June 3, 2015, 2015, under the influence of alcohol in the D cafeteria operated by the victim C, she laid a junice fluor on the floor, laid down the fluor’s fluor, laid down the fluor’s fluor, and broken down the fluor, such as a fluor, that was on the fluor.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the market price of the victim's property.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2015. 6. 3. 21:45경 구미시 B에 있는 위 D식당에서 피고인이 위와 같이 소란을 피운다는 신고를 받고 출동한 구미경찰서 소속 경찰관 E, F, G이 자신을 제지한다는 것에 불만을 품고, 위 E의 가슴을 양손으로 1회 밀치고, 이를 말리는 위 F에게 "야 씨발놈아, 뭐야 새끼야"라고 욕을 하면서 주먹으로 머리를 1회 때리고, 오른 발로 허벅지를 2회 찼으며, 위 G에게 "야 개새끼야" 라고 욕을 하면서 오른 발로 무릎을 2회 차 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the 112 Report Handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made to F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the obstruction of performance of official duties

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment specified for the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the punishment for the crimes against F with heavy punishment);

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (in addition to punishment for a fine of 2005, a person has no record of punishment for a period other than a fine of 2005, has been faithfully engaged in work and has supported three children who are under the age and age of his or her own negligence after he or she committed a crime by taking advantage of his or her negligence, and after he or she had been faced with his or her negligence, he or she seems to have reached an agreement with the owner of his or her business, and even with police officers, it seems that he or she would have committed several offenses).

arrow