beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) was that the Defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim as stated in the judgment below, and the injury inflicted on the victim was incurred in the process of being taken over by himself regardless of the Defendant, as follows.
① With respect to the injury on May 3, 2010, the victim did not have any knife the victim’s hand, etc., and only caused the two knife North Korea to be spawn and vagabonds.
② On May 30, 2010, the injury occurred on May 30, 2010, the Defendant locked the door of the car and started from the tent, and the victim was able to drive away from his own.
③ With respect to a second half of June 2011, the Defendant did not have a scam, and the Defendant was injured while the victim scams the scam and scambling the scam, etc. after the scamscams.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as otherwise alleged in the lower judgment is recognized.
(1) The statements made by the victim regarding the developments and extent of each injury are consistent from the time when the initial police make a statement at the original police station to the time when the statement at the original court is made, and also conforms to objective data that show each injury, such as photographs
② In the case of injury on May 3, 2010 and injury in order on June 3, 2011, the content of the photograph and diagnosis showing the damage suffered by the victim at that time seems to be difficult to occur in relation to the facts alleged by the Defendant, as alleged by the Defendant, in light of the parts and degree of the injury.
③ In the case of injury on May 30, 2010, the victim reported to the police on May 30, 2010. Although the victim reported to the police on the day of the instant case, the details reported to the police are different from the judgment of the court below (the Defendant came to go beyond the floor by starting a car).