1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a vehicle of CM5.

On May 12, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on May 12, 2017:15, and turned down the vehicle at a speed of about 10 km per hour in front of the apartment door in the middle of the Seoul Northern-gu.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive by accurately manipulating the steering direction, brake system, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop in the signal air behind the Defendant’s vehicle, and the victim D(30 years of age)’s E-Wood Driving Vehicle, followed by the Defendant’s vehicle and the part behind the Defendant’s vehicle, was shocked with the part behind the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as catum dye, requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

2. On May 12, 2016, at around 07:49, the Defendant received a traffic accident report at the place of the said accident and received a demand for the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting four minutes from around 49 minutes to around 08:38 of the same day, on the grounds that there exist reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking and smelling, from G in the process of ensuring the living safety of the Gwangju Northern Police Station Police Station and from G in the process of the F District Unit, which was dispatched to the site.

Nevertheless, the Defendant avoided the resistance of the drinking-free measuring instrument by means of making it difficult for the Defendant to enter, and failed to comply with the police officer’s request for the measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Results of verification of drinking meters in this Act;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Traffic accident reports, report on the circumstantial statement of the driver concerned, investigation report (Attachment to the ledger using sound measuring instruments).