All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (two years of imprisonment, respectively) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflects depth, the defendants committed the crime of this case even though they had been punished for the same kind of crime, in spite of the fact that the defendants committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime, despite the value and frequency of theft of the stolen goods, the defendants did not completely recover from damage despite considerable amount of the value and frequency of theft, and other various circumstances, which form the conditions for sentencing in this case, including the defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., the court below's sentence against the defendants is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendants' assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.