logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.01.08 2014노275
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendant intending to drive away from the victim D, she was in the air conditioners adjacent to the main body of the Defendant, the Defendant could not be able to her at the time of the victim D due to the Defendant’s rash, which is the driving day of the Defendant.

The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the charges that the defendant injured the victim's head and loss due to beer's disease, is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. The prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court (three years of probation in one year and six months of imprisonment, and two hundred hours of community service order) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below regarding the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts are revealed: ① the victim D consistently stated that the Defendant her head was fluored with beer disease and was re-fluored by beer disease; ② the witness J, who was a witness, stated that the Defendant her head was fluord with beer disease and entered the beer disease; ③ the Defendant’s head was fluord with the CCTV immediately after the main point of this case was disputed with the victim D; ② the Defendant’s head was fluord with beer disease; ② the Defendant’s head was fluord with beer disease; ④ the Defendant’s head was fluord with beer disease; ④ the Defendant’s head was fluord with beer disease; and ④ the Defendant’s head was fluord with beer and fluord with the CCTV’s fluor, but it was difficult for the Defendant to fluort the CCTV.

arrow