logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.12.12 2018구합101740
참여제한 및 환수금 처분취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Defendant is the head of the Small and Medium Technology Information Promotion Agency established with the aim of contributing to strengthening competitiveness through management innovation and improvement of productivity by efficiently promoting the informatization management of small and medium enterprises pursuant to the Act on the Promotion of Technology Innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises. The Plaintiff Company A (hereinafter “Plaintiff Company”) aims at manufacturing and selling optical telecommunications components, systems, electronic parts, program development, etc. and incidental business related thereto. The Plaintiff Company B is the internal director of the Plaintiff Company.

B. On August 28, 2014, the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration designated the Defendant as a specialized institution by posting “D” as a public announcement of the Small and Medium Business Administration.

Plaintiff

On December 18, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with the Defendant on the technology development project with respect to the E (hereinafter “instant task”), as follows, and reported F as the person responsible for the instant task.

Since then, the Plaintiff Company entered into an entrustment research and development agreement with the Sung Pung-si University, and performed the instant task together with the industry-academic cooperation foundation for the Sung Pung-si University.

D E

C. On November 2, 2015, upon the request of the Plaintiff Company, the person responsible for the instant task was changed from F to Plaintiff B.

The defendant, on December 21, 2017, determined the result of the plaintiffs' task performance as a failure or suspension project due to the evaluation conducted by the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration on December 21, 2017, pursuant to Article 31(1)1 and (4), Article 32(1) and (3) of the Innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises Act, Article 20(2), and attached Table 21(1)2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, and attached Table 3 of Article 30(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Small and Medium Enterprise Technology Development Promotion Act.

(a) The reason that the research and development process is conducted in an unfaithful manner and the result thereof is extremely poor;

arrow