logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.10 2013노2155
사기등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the lower court’s punishment (the first crime, the second crime, the second crime, the second crime, the second crime, the imprisonment with prison labor for six months, the two years of suspended execution with prison labor for six months, and the two years of suspended execution with prison labor for one year, the probation for one year, and the community service order 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant's mistake reflects the defendant's mistake; the crime of fraud against the victim D in each of the crimes in this case; the crime of forging private document and the crime of uttering of falsified document are concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime of violation of the Promotion of Game Industry Act stated in the judgment; and the punishment of fraud against the victim D in this case, the crime of forging private document and the crime of uttering of falsified document should be fully considered with the case where the judgment was rendered at the same time with regard to the crime of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, which became final and conclusive, with regard to the punishment of the crime of fraud against the victim D in this case; the crime of this case is not good, such as deceiving the victims as if they could have repaid money borrowed in a situation where no other property or income exists; the crime of this case is committed; the amount of damage caused by the fraud reaches 67,500,000 won; the defendant did not reach agreement with the victim D; the defendant has the same criminal records; the defendant's age, character and character, home environment, and motive for the crime in this case.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow