logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.07.20 2017고단756
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in BCrler.

On March 21, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 10:30, and came to turn to the left at the seat of the D Golf Practice Center parking lot located in Mineyang-si C, and turn to the left.

Since there is a center line of the yellow-ray, a person engaged in driving service shall not immediately turn to the left at the seat of the rooftop IC by breaking the center line at the D golf practice room parking lot.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the left due to the negligence of the center line and the left-hand turn, and the FOba driven by the victim E, which was driven by the victim E, and the vehicle driven by the Defendant, the front right-hand side of the car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 12 weeks of the above victim’s treatment due to the above occupational negligence, such as the pelle and stoke stoke.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The degree of damage to the victim for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is serious, and the defendant's negligence is not weak.

In the occurrence of the instant traffic accident, the situation where the victim appeared to have been negligent in performing his/her duty at the front time of the victim and the victim did not want the punishment of the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

In consideration of these favorable circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.

arrow