The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence

(1) The reasoning of the Plaintiff’s appeal is not significantly different from the assertion in the first instance court, and in light of the evidence submitted by the first instance court, the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court are deemed legitimate. The first instance court’s “influence” in Articles 6 and 7 of the 5th and 7 of the first instance court’s “influencesive acts” is not the purpose of the contract itself but the advisory activities related to real estate transactions are incidental to the mediation of real estate transactions, and if the advisory activities are deemed as incidental to such advisory activities are excluded from the brokerage activities subject to the regulation of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act, a non-licensed real estate agent is allowed to act as a broker for real estate transactions under the name of the non-licensed real estate agent. This is considered to go against the purport of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act which strictly prohibits real estate brokerage by a non-licensed real estate agent. (5) The Plaintiff voluntarily assessed his act as a “real estate intermediary” after the instant sales contract.

Article 11 to 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance of the first instance of the following facts: (a) “Isia initially agreed to receive the payment according to the business promotion expenses and performance of each month from the Defendant and started the work of the Plaintiff; and (b) continued to perform the relevant work for about five months; (c) the Plaintiff stated in the relevant case that I had been engaged in real estate for a long time; and (d) the Defendant introduced the Plaintiff as a person with outstanding number of real estate disposal and requested the Plaintiff to sell the instant real estate; and (e) details, purpose, period, and attitude of the Plaintiff’