The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (two years of imprisonment, confiscation, and surcharge 2.9 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of each of the crimes of this case and the fact that the defendant is against confinement life, the defendant's cooperation in the investigation of related cases. However, the amount of narcotics that the defendant bought and sold or possessed is not much sufficient, in terms of social harm and the risk of recidivism, the crime related to narcotics is not only punishable several times, but also the defendant has committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime for the same kind of crime, and the defendant has committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime as well as equality with criminal punishment for other crimes similar to each of the crimes of this case, and other criminal sentencing conditions of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of each of the crimes of this case, and circumstances after each of the crimes of this case, it cannot be deemed unfair for the court below to have imposed

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.