beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 23,242,00 and the interest rate thereon from July 28, 2016 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is the leader of the system in which 26 members of the fraternity were established (hereinafter “instant system”).
Defendant B is a member of the instant fraternity, and Defendant C is a wife of Defendant B and a person who attended the instant fraternity in the name of Defendant B and was engaged in practical activities.
D is the defendants' children.
B. The instant fraternity was operated in the following manner:
Operating Period: 26 months from January 2015 to February 2017: 20,000 won per unit of account ( semi-annual paid-in: 80,000 won per unit of account, and 200,000 won per month from the day after the receipt of the fraternity is added to the interest of KRW 1,00,000 per month.
C. On December 25, 2014, Defendant B participated in the amount of KRW 20,000,000 from the Plaintiff as one member of the instant fraternity, upon receipt of the advance payment from the Plaintiff, and subsequently, Defendant B participated in the amount of KRW 4 and 10.
(10) In addition, the Plaintiff paid KRW 8,00,000 to Defendant B on April 24, 2014, and KRW 6,558,00 on May 22, 2014, respectively.
On April 24, 2015, the Plaintiff deducted 2,000,000 won from the limit amount to KRW 10,000,000,000, and paid only KRW 8,000,000 from the limit amount to KRW 10,000. On May 22, 2015, the Plaintiff deducted 2,30,000,000 from the limit amount to KRW 1,111,571, and the card amount to be paid by the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff and paid KRW 6,58,429,00.
The amount of the claim in this case reflects the amount deducted as above (as such, as deemed as payment completion). D.
If Defendant B adjusts the accounts to be paid by him according to the rules of the fraternity of this case, the following table 1 shall be as follows:
Table 1 [Ground for recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2 and Eul evidence 2-1 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant C performed substantial activities in the instant community as Defendant B’s qualification, and at least did not indicate that it was an agent for Defendant B.