logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2014.03.21 2013가단38087
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From September 8, 2013, the above-mentioned A

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 28, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant and the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) with respect to the real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”), stating that the lease deposit is KRW 10,000,000, monthly rent is KRW 1,200,000 (payment on August 8, 201), and the lease term is from November 8, 201 to November 7, 2014 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. The Defendant takes over the instant real estate and occupies and uses it until the date of closing the argument of the instant case. As such, the Defendant did not pay a monthly rent from September 8, 2013 to September 8, 2013.

C. Meanwhile, on October 28, 2013, the duplicate of the instant complaint containing the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the instant lease agreement on the ground that the Defendant delayed the payment of monthly rent under the instant lease agreement.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts finding as to the Plaintiff’s assertion on the cause of claim, the overdue overdue charge under the instant lease agreement depends on the two-year overdue charge.

As such, the instant lease contract was lawfully terminated on October 28, 2013, which included the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the instant lease contract, and the copy of the instant complaint was served on the Defendant.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and to pay a monthly rent of KRW 1,200,000 according to the agreement from September 8, 2013 to the delivery of the instant real estate from September 8, 2013, commencing the Defendant’s delinquency in paying the monthly rent, or unjust enrichment equivalent to the monthly rent.

I would like to say.

B. As to the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant agreed with the Plaintiff on the issue of establishing a factory in part of the instant real estate, and the Plaintiff agreed on the increase in monthly rent.

arrow