1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, KRW 4,187,204 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto from May 13, 2017 to November 5, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant stated the document No. 7 as M Co., Ltd.

However, there is no material to confirm whether the defendant is a real corporation, and the defendant claims that the defendant is a party to the contract.

On June 20, 2015, the land category of D forest 164 square meters in Asan-si, Asan-si, and three parcels on August 25, 2016, which is 164 square meters in D forest 164 square meters was changed from the forest site to the forest site. On August 29, 2016, Ngi 409 square meters,O large 147 square meters, and P region 951 square meters was combined, and the area was 1671 square meters in the area was divided into H. 58 square meters in September 6, 2016, and 556 square meters in the area as H.

approximately 500 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “the instant site”) determined a new construction of 3 bonds of single house (hereinafter referred to as “instant house”) as a building area standard of 3.5 million won per square meter (including civil engineering works) and received supply of and demand for a new construction of 3 bonds of single house.

Of three bonds, one of the three bonds was to be constructed under the name of the defendant, and the defendant agreed to bear one-third of the construction cost.

(hereinafter “instant construction project”). (b)

On June 2015, the Defendant subcontracted the instant construction work to the friendly job offering Plaintiff at KRW 3 million per square year, and the Plaintiff commenced the construction work.

C. Of the instant housing, 2 debentures in the name of C, 1 debentures in the name of the Defendant’s wife, 2 debentures in the name of C were 26 square meters in the building area, respectively, and 1 debentures in the name of the Defendant’s side (hereinafter “instant Defendant’s housing”) were 25 square meters in the building area.

Among the instant construction works, stone storage works were replaced by 4.75m on the front and right side on the design drawing by 4.015m, and 1.15m on the back by 3m.

Accordingly, additional expenses incurred in the construction of stone storage work on the site of the Defendant’s housing in this case are KRW 5,374,600.

E. During the construction process of the instant case, the Plaintiff and the Defendant increased the construction cost from KRW 3 million to KRW 3.5 million per square year.

In addition, the plaintiff, together with the defendant, requested C (her husband Q, to increase the construction cost due to additional construction work, and C shall be KRW 91 million per bond and KRW 9 million per bond.