The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles) is as follows: (a) the Defendant did not have kisk the victim’s hand, etc.; (b) the Defendant did not contact the victim’s hand kis, but did not cut the kis, and (c) the Defendant did so with the hole of Australia and the kissc

In other words, only the victim was involved in the accident.

Therefore, the defendant was not forced to commit an indecent act against the victim.

2. In addition to the circumstances of the lower court’s detailed determination, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, whether the victim, as consistently from the investigative agency to the lower court, “after recognizing the fact that the floor of the loss was in contact with the gender,” the Defendant’s “Isson, now,” is the victim.

“Grasor”, Defendant sacrine with the victim, and sacrine with the victim

shall not be forced to enforce the order.

In addition, it was said to the effect that it will now go to the house.

"The defendant made a statement (the 25,26th day of the investigation record, the trial record 41,42th day of the trial record), that the defendant's attitude is merely difficult to see the fact that the defendant's attitude is a friendly person, ② the defendant reported to the police that occurred immediately from the victim's knife, the victim's knife, and the victim's knife.

“The Defendant made a statement to the effect that it was “(48 pages, 100 pages),” and the Defendant’s act did not appear to have been expressed to the victim or his employees immediately after the instant case, as well as the fact that the Defendant’s act was not likely to have been a serious loss. ③ In light of the brightness of the place of the instant crime (13 pages of the investigation records), the Defendant’s special characteristics of the Defendant’s sexual color, such as the Defendant’s assertion, could not be identified. However, considering the fact that the Defendant’s form cannot be distinguished from his fingers, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit. As such, the Defendant’s indecent act can be acknowledged in the same manner as written in the facts charged.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.