The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and three months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and his depth and reflects on the degree of damage caused by the crime of this case, the economic difficulty is causing the crime of this case, and the defendant does not repeat the crime of this case. However, there are many criminal records that the defendant committed the crime of this case, the defendant committed the crime of this case repeatedly without being aware of even though he was a repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, the defendant committed the crime of this case repeatedly, the crime of this case is not good, the attitude of the crime is not good, there is no agreement with the victims, there is no change in special circumstances or circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and the defendant's character and conduct, environment, relationship with victims, motive, means and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, etc. are considered appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, since Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act is apparent that the term "Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act" is a clerical error in the "Article 347(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act," it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on