logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.29 2019나80246
구상금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. At the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, the Defendant’s vehicle, at the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, is proceeding from the f elementary school to the permanent middle distance room at the 20:40 on April 2, 2019 to the f.

The amount calculated by subtracting the total repair cost of KRW 2,340,420 (the repair cost of the plaintiff vehicle) from the total repair cost of KRW 2,340,420 (the repair cost of the plaintiff vehicle) from the total repair cost of KRW 468,00,00, which is the part adjacent to the left side of the defendant vehicle, which has been changed from the two-lanes to the normal one due to the aftermad safety zone while entering the safety zone as a one-lane.

The circumstances of the instant accident are as follows.

B. Meanwhile, when the Plaintiff paid the Plaintiff’s insurance money to the Plaintiff’s driver, the insured, and then filed a claim for reimbursement against the Defendant, the Defendant filed a claim against the Defendant for deliberation on the dispute over reimbursement of automobile insurance (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Deliberation Committee on the Settlement of Compensation Money (hereinafter “Deliberation Committee”) in accordance with the mutual agreement on the deliberation of the dispute over reimbursement of automobile insurance.

On September 16, 2019, the Deliberation Committee decided the negligence ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle to 10% and 90% (hereinafter “instant decision”).

On September 24, 2019, the Plaintiff appealed to the above decision and filed the instant lawsuit.

C. Meanwhile, the main contents of the instant agreement and its enforcement rules, which serve as the basis for the establishment of the Deliberation Committee, are as follows.

The purpose of this Agreement is to rationally and economically resolve disputes arising between the insurer or the mutual-aider about the existence and scope of liability for the liability for automobile insurance or automobile mutual-aid as provided for in the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, etc. on the deliberation of disputes over liability for automobile insurance.

Article 3 (Scope of Application) All agreements companies;

arrow