1. The part concerning the claim for nullification of the disciplinary action in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a district forestry cooperative established for the purpose of promoting forest management by providing members with technology, funds, information, etc., and expanding the number of forest products produced by its members and promoting the enhancement of the status of its members. From September 25, 2009 to March 20, 2015, the Plaintiff retired from the term of office on March 20, 2015.

B. From February 23, 2015 to February 25, 2015, the Audit and Inspection Federation of the National Forestry Cooperatives Federation demanded the Defendant to conduct an occasional audit of the member cooperatives in 2015. As a result, the Defendant pointed out the following matters and demanded the Defendant to take measures equivalent to the disciplinary action against the Plaintiff.

1. Where the president of a cooperative under the budget compilation guidelines applicable to the Defendant operates a government-owned vehicle, transportation subsidies may not be paid. From January 1, 2011 to February 24, 2015, the Plaintiff received KRW 11,974,660, such as the statement of the payment of transportation subsidies from the head of the cooperative since 11 year after the attached Table 11, even if he/she commutes to his/her workplace by using a government-owned vehicle.

2) On December 24, 2014, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 2,101,00 for the special bonus of the president of the partnership in 2014 without going through the resolution procedure required by the general meeting required by the articles of association. 3) The Plaintiff was indicted for violating the Framework Act on the Construction Industry and became final and conclusive at the first instance trial on October 30, 2014. The Plaintiff paid contingent fees to the attorney-at-law. At the time, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant’s opposition to the employees at that time to handle the amount as Defendant’s expenses, and the Defendant’s technical guidance director and four other persons collected KRW 3,300,000,000 for the purpose of contingent fees, and the Plaintiff actually received money and valuables from the employees.

C. One defendant, such as the defendant's resolution on disciplinary action against the plaintiff, shall be the plaintiff at the meeting of the board of directors on April 9, 2015 in accordance with the above audit results.