logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.10.22 2020고단6580
특수상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in driving a C low-est car, and Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a D high-purt vehicle.

1. A around 17:41 on July 1, 2020, Defendant A driven the above high-speed car and driven it at a speed of about 60 km from the potteral road to the potteral road located in the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

The Defendant, on the ground that the victim B, who is running above, used the cell phone while driving the above A-Wnd-Wing-Wing-Wing-C-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing

2. At around 17:41 on July 1, 2020, Defendant B driven the said Ampurged vehicle and proceeded from the right edge of Yeonsu-gu to the right edge of the pottery road at a speed of about 60km from the right edge to the pottery road.

As seen in the above 1. The Defendant, as seen in the above 1. The victim Gap suffered from the defect of retaliationed driving, and the victim himself, using the above A-to-pur vehicle, was frighted to pay the above vehicle to the victim, and operated the vehicle rapidly in the future of the above low-est vehicle. The defendant was driving at around 2 km over the above high-est vehicle again, such as preventing the course of the above high-est vehicle, and the defendant was driving at around 2 km over the above high-est vehicle. The defendant was taking the right side part of the above high-est vehicle with the left side part of the above high-est vehicle and got about 2 weeks medical treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. An inquiry into the enemy;

arrow