logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.05.13 2019고단4458
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 29, 2019, at around 01:28, Defendant A, at the “D” point in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju Dong-gu, there was a dispute on the grounds that he could not be identified with other tables customers. While verifying the details of the report by the swayF belonging to the Gwangju Dong Police Station E Zone, which was called upon 112, and the police officer confirmed, the details of the report, the Defendant did not want to deal with the case, and the Defendant’s daily activities were under the influence of alcohol. As the Defendant’s daily activities were under the influence of alcohol, they carried the Defendant into the E zone by carrying the patrol vehicle and requesting the Defendant to take protective measures.

At around 02:25 on the same day, the Defendant committed assault, without any reason, at the entrance of the Gwangju Dong Police Station E District Unit in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, the chest part of a slope F in his body, and without any reason, the Inspector I's chest part in his body.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and protective measures by police officers.

2. At around 02:25 on September 29, 2019, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) Defendant 2, at the entrance of the Gwangju Dong Police Station E-gu, Gwangju Dong Police Station E-gu, Gwangju Dong Police Station, deeming that J, as his hand, arrested A as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties; and (b) Defendant 2 committed assault, such as fladoning the right side part of his work clothes and the external steering knife on the back side of his uniforms; and (c) fladoning the shoulder once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of the witness J, F and I;

1. Partial statement of the witness K in the court;

1. Some statements in the police interrogation protocol regarding Defendant B

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Police officer's photographic photo of the part damaged by J;

1. Defendant B (hereinafter in this part referred to as the “Defendant”) and his defense counsel’s assertion on the E District ctv video and ctv video and clock video, and their defense counsel.

arrow