1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 42,023,034 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from February 17, 2016 to January 12, 2018.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of entertainment entertainment entertainment business, etc., and the defendant is a company established for the purpose of planning sports, entertainment, and various events and conducting incidental business.

On October 8, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a performance agreement with the Defendant that the Defendant plans to organize and hold the instant performance (hereinafter referred to as “instant performance”) of the Plaintiff’s artist C (hereinafter referred to as “instant performance”) that will be held seven times in total in Japan (hereinafter referred to as “instant performance agreement”) and the main contents thereof are as follows.

Part 1 of the performance set forth in Article 3(2) of the Corresponding Date of December 2015, 2015, 2nd day of the Franch Agreement, 2nd day of December 2015, ASEAN and its surrounding cities, 2nd day of May, 1, 2012, 2nd day of October, 200, 2nd day of October, 200, 2nd day of October, 1st day of October, 200, 2nd day of October, 200, 3nd day of the Maresponding 242,00,000 won (including value-added tax) based on the Plaintiff.

In principle, the expenses incurred in performing the performance shall be fully responsible and operated by the defendant, and the plaintiff shall not be held responsible for all additional expenses.

Article 5(1) MD goods outlined by the Defendant shall sell a total of six kinds of MD goods (including the sale of performance video recording at the DV site) and pay 88,000,000 won (including value-added tax) to the Plaintiff.

Article 5(3) when the payment is commenced, the defendant shall pay the basic succession to the plaintiff by October 23, 2015.

Article 6 (1) The defendant shall pay the opening of MD products to the plaintiff by the end of November 2015.

The plaintiff's duty under Article 6 (2) shall not interfere with the event by arriving in the performance place not later than three hours prior to the time of the performance of this case on the day of the performance.

The defendant's obligations under Article 3 (6) shall operate the performance business of this case without interruption.

Article 7 The plaintiff and the defendant shall not perform their respective duties under the performance contract of this case.