logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.12.12 2012고정623
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On April 15, 2009, the Defendant stated the name “E” and “F” of the subscriber column and “E” in the form of a mobile phone subscription application form that was kept at the agency in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D on April 15, 2009, using a verification color pen to enter the subscriber’s name “E” and “E” in the applicant and buyer column at that bottom, and affixed a seal back to that name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a mobile phone subscription application in the name of E, a private document on the rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. At the above time and place, the Defendant: (a) delivered a forged mobile phone subscription application form to G, an agency employee, as if it were a document duly formed; and (b) exercised it.

C. As above, the Defendant opened H mobile phones from April 15, 2009.

6.2. The mobile phone user fee of KRW 746,01 and KRW 561,00 for the mobile phone amount to KRW 1,307,015 were not paid, and the mobile phone user fee of KRW 746,00 was not paid, thereby making profits equivalent to the same amount of property.

Around April 2009, the Defendant said to the effect that “I would open and use a mobile phone under the name of four in the payment of the internal price” to the dynamic victim E, a cohabitant at a place in an unsound place.

However, even if the defendant opened and used a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the mobile phone usage fee and the mobile phone price.

Around April 15, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, opened a mobile phone in the name of the victim at his agency in Yongsan-gu D, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si and used the aforementioned mobile phone by June 2, 2009, and caused the victim to pay a total of KRW 1,307,015, including KRW 746,015, and KRW 561,000, and KRW 561,000, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant is a mobile phone in the name of E with the intention to teach E, which is the omission of E, with the intention of E.

arrow