logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.01.25 2018누61071
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

Reasons

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff sought the revocation of the decision of retrial rendered in relation to the case of removal from position unfair, unfair lectures, and relief application for unfair dismissal as stated in the purport of the claim (hereinafter “the decision of retrial of this case”). The first instance court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim regarding removal from position unfair, and accepted the Plaintiff’s claim as to the remainder of unfair lectures and unfair dismissal.

As to this, the defendant and the defendant joining the defendant appealed only to the part against which they lost, the scope of the trial of this court is limited to the part of unfair lectures and unfair dismissal in the judgment of the retrial of this case.

2. Basic facts

A. The party status 1) The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”)

(2) On December 3, 2015, pursuant to Article 13 of the Korea Medicine Promotion Act, an incorporated foundation established with the aim of “the contribution to the promotion of national health and the development of the national economy through the development of oriental medicine technology and the promotion of industry, etc.” under Article 13 of the Korea Medicine Promotion Act (hereinafter “Korea Medicine Promotion Act”), has its principal office in Yongsan-si, and has conducted projects, such as the promotion of scientific informatization of oriental medicine technology with approximately 160 full-time workers, using approximately 160 full-time workers. (2) An intervenor was incorporated by integrating D, a foundation (hereinafter “D”) and E inside (hereinafter “G”).

3) On August 5, 2015, the Plaintiff joined D and served as H of the Intervenor’s establishment promotion group. On December 30, 2015, the Plaintiff succeeded to employment as the Intervenor and served as the chief of the headquarters, and served as the chief of the J headquarters from December 19, 2016. (B) The Minister of Health and Welfare, who is the supervisory agency of the Intervenor, is the Minister of Health and Welfare from February 2, 2017 to March 29, 2017, has formulated self-plan for the establishment of public office discipline for the intervenors through several times, comply with the rules on the management of public service (e.g., commuting and heavy time compliance) and inspection of the status of service by agency.

arrow