1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant’s dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on June 17, 2013 shall be revoked.

3...

1. Circumstances of dispositions;

A. On February 26, 1993, the Plaintiff was appointed as a Grade 10 driver at the public prosecutor's office of Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office. From July 2005, the Plaintiff was working at the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Team. On April 11, 2007, the Plaintiff was promoted to Grade 8.

B. On June 17, 2013, the Defendant issued a resolution of June 5, 2013 by the General Disciplinary Committee of the Daejeon High Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “Seoul High Public Prosecutor’s Office”) to the Plaintiff on June 17, 2013, and notified the Plaintiff of the status of investigation, such as whether to issue a search and seizure warrant for cell phone text messages, etc. of the persons concerned at the Chungcheongnam District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Education in the year 2012. The Defendant, upon request of the Director C of the Daejeon High Public Prosecutor’s Office of Education, notified the fact that the Plaintiff violated the duty of search and seizure issued on October 23, 2012, and notified the fact that the Plaintiff violated the duty of search and seizure issued on June 24, 2012 from Daejeon High Public Prosecutor’s Office of 20 to 30: The Plaintiff, who was subject to the duty of search and seizure from Daejeon High Public Prosecutor’s Office of 20:00 to 26:00, who was issued the duty of search and seizure warrant.