1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On April 17, 2015, based on the Plaintiff’s request by B, a military motive, the Plaintiff received each of the loans of KRW 5,000,000 from the Korea Exchange on April 14, 2015, from Defendant L&C Capital Loans of KRW 30,000,000,000 from Defendant C&C Loans of KRW 5,000,000 from Defendant C&C Loans of KRW 5,00,00,00 from Defendant C&C Loans of KRW 1 to 4,00,00 from each of the parties, or by the overall purport of oral pleadings and arguments.

2. The plaintiff asserts that each loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants is by deception B, and even if not, B has exempted the plaintiff from the obligation to the defendants, the plaintiff's obligation under the above loan agreement against the defendants does not exist.

First, according to the plaintiff's assertion, even if the plaintiff entered into each loan agreement with the defendants due to the deception of B, the plaintiff should have known or could have known that the plaintiff had known of the deception of B in order to cancel each loan agreement on the grounds of this, and there is no evidence to support this. Thus, this part of the plaintiff's assertion

Next, Article 454 of the Civil Act provides that, in the event of a third party’s assumption of an obligation based on a contract with the obligor and thereby discharging the obligor’s obligation, it shall take effect against the obligee only with the obligee’s consent. Thus, in the absence of the obligee’s consent, even if the obligor and underwriter agree to assume an obligation based on a contract with the obligor, it shall not take effect only as a performance acceptance, etc., and the obligor shall not be exempted from the obligation.