logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.12.19 2013가단21618
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant Company ordered production management by proxy with 50,000 won of clothes, such as Brazil (hereinafter “A”), under a production management agency contract with A (hereinafter “O”) as follows. The Defendant Company directly selected the original and subsidiary material companies, rewinging companies, and transportation agents necessary for the production of clothes in the Republic of Korea, and supplied the above original and subsidiary material companies to rewing the original and subsidiary material companies, and 50,000 won of the clothes completed by rewing companies to the Incheon port by the date designated by the Cresh. The Defendant Company entered into a contract with A for production management by proxy. The Defendant Company shall pay the 3,380 won of the above clothes at production and management costs per head, and the Defendant Company shall pay the 100,000 won of the clothes materials, 500,000 won of the clothes in the Cresh.

B. Pursuant to the above production management agency contract, A selected each of the companies with the trade name “B” located in China as the original supplier, as the subsidiary materials supplier, the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff and the sub-sponsor and sub-materials supplier, and as the subsidiary materials supplier, the company with the trade name “C” and “D” located in China (hereinafter “B, “C,” and “D”) and had B and the Plaintiff provide the above sub-sponsor and sub-sponsor and sub-materials to the above sub-sponsor.

C. A around March 15, 2013, around March 15, 2013, ordered the Plaintiff to supply secondary materials in accordance with the first supplementary materials work instruction and the second supplementary materials work instruction.

On April 15, 2013, 272, 7272, 2727, 2727, 273 30,000,000, 491,700,000 on May 2, 2013, 2013, 447,000,000 44,700,000 on May 2, 2013, 2013; 252,15,000,27,365,000 27,365,000 on May 7, 2013; 7, 75,000,000,000 70,000,000,50,002,50,000,000,008,008,008,008,817,278,284,207

D. The Plaintiff’s four occasions is as follows.

arrow