The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Of the facts charged in the instant case, there is no fact that the Defendant issued a philophone without compensation on the date and time indicated in the foregoing facts charged, with respect to the issuance of a Melogram (one-name “philophone”, hereinafter “philophone”).

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. The lower court’s sentence (one hundred months of imprisonment, additional collection) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: “The Defendant provided C with approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs, at the racing funeral hall located in Yongsan-dong, from February 21, 2014, on or around 01:30 on or about February 21, 2014.” (2) The Defendant consistently denied this part of the facts charged by asserting that there was no provision of opononon from the investigative agency to this court, and that there was no provision of opononon to C without compensation. Therefore, the Defendant’s defense counsel admitted this part of the facts charged at the original court. However, examining the contents of the reflecton submitted by the Defendant after the closure of the oral argument in the lower court, the Defendant did not have issued the opon without compensation, but appears to have stated that the Defendant was aware of the facts charged at the time of seeking a prior election, and the following circumstances recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the record of this case, namely, the following circumstances that C and the prosecutor were given at the date and place of delivery of 20.