A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 201, the Defendant: (a) was a person who registered as an attorney in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building 202; (b) was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months by imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Law of Defense at the Seoul Central District Court on September 2, 201; (c) dismissed the appeal on January 27, 2012; and (d) dismissed the appeal on March 23, 2012; and (c) the registration of the attorney was revoked by the Korean Bar Association on July 3, 2012.

No person, other than an attorney-at-law, shall provide legal consultation or handle legal affairs in return for money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits.

Defendant D, as above, requested the Defendant to file a lawsuit on February 2, 2013 in Suwon District Court, which was located in Suwondong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (hereinafter “E”), after the registration of the attorney was revoked, will be held that the Suwon District Court Branch Branch Branch 2013 filed a lawsuit against E (Defendant) for 887 damages claim and 2013 Gohap 894 damages claim as the Defendant’s agent for the case of the claim for compensation for delay.

I would like to file a lawsuit of loan claim against E as an agent of the plaintiff of the party.

“Falsely speaking,” it received KRW 3 million from the injured party on February 21, 2013 as part of the retainerion amount, from the national bank account in the F’s name, and was remitted KRW 3.22 million on April 4, 2013 to the same account under the pretext of recognition.

However, the Defendant had already been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a violation of the law of defense around September 2, 201, and was sentenced on March 23, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 23, 2012 by the Korean Bar Association on July 3, 2012, and was unable to act as a litigation agent normally due to the cancellation of the registration of an attorney-at-law by the Korean Bar Association, and was not able to act as a litigation agent. As such, the Defendant’s failure to repay bank loans to the bank account was under seizure, etc., and thus, the Defendant had no ability to perform legal affairs promised to the victim even

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.