1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 10, 2015 to May 11, 2016.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff and C are legally married couples who completed the marriage report on September 4, 1998. 2) The Defendant, even with knowledge that C is a married person (here and woman), sent and received C and C were sent to the police officer from January 1, 2015 to February 2, 2015, and expressed that C and C were self-referring to the other party and wanting to report, and sexual deaf-mutes were sexually expressed.

In addition, around August 2015, high school (D) mountain village conference continued to be doping for three days, such as G and Jeju-do 2-day travel, and C introduced the defendant to a third party as franchis.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements and images, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. Determination 1) A third party shall not interfere with a marital life falling under the essence of marriage by intervening in a marital life of another person. The act of a third party by committing an unlawful act with one of the married couple, thereby infringing on or hindering the marital life falling under the essence of marriage and infringing on the rights of the spouse as the spouse, thereby causing mental distress to the spouse, constitutes a tort in principle (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 201Meu2997, Nov. 20, 2014). “Unlawful act committed by a spouse prescribed in subparagraph 1 of Article 840 of the Civil Act” means a larger concept including the adultery, but does not reach the gap, but includes any unlawful act that is not faithful to the marital duty (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 88Meu7, May 24, 198), and whether an unlawful act is an unlawful act should be assessed in consideration of the degree and circumstances of each specific case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Meu38, Apr. 28, 2013).