logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2016.05.12 2015가단16299
원상회복 및 건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Attached drawings (1), (2), (3), (4), and (1) of the real estate listed in the Attached List;

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On December 16, 2014, the Plaintiff indicated in the separate sheet in the attached sheet to the Defendant as indicated in the following: ①, ②, ③, ④, and ①, the leased deposit amount of KRW 10,000,000, monthly rent, KRW 1,250,000 (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) with respect to the leased portion of KRW 180,000,000 in the attached sheet among the real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) among the real estate listed in the attached list: the period from January 5, 2015 to January 4, 2016.

B. On January 5, 2015, the Defendant, while occupying and using the instant commercial building on delivery, did not pay the second rent until April 15, 2015.

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff terminated the lease agreement on September 30, 2015 on the grounds of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent for more than two years, and sought the return of leased objects and the payment of unjust enrichment equivalent to rent or rent.

2. Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow