beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The amount of digging shall be calculated by the end of May by the end of 5th, on the one hand, by calculating the amount of KRW 125,000,00 on the one hand, when the Defendant supplied the cryp to himself/herself, in G operated by the Victim F in Sin Young-si, Sin-si.”
However, the Defendant operated M Co., Ltd. with an advance payment of KRW 100 million from K, KRW 150 million from K, KRW 150 million from L, and KRW 1190 million from L, even at the time of the successful bid for M Co., Ltd., the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the advance payment, as stipulated in the terms and conditions, even if having received the advance payment from the victim, for instance, the Defendant borrowed approximately KRW 1190 million from the offshore pains, etc. at the time of the successful bid for M Co., Ltd., and supplied the processed amount of the advance payment to the company that received the advance payment at the time.
On May 14, 2009, the Defendant received from the victim 40 networked 1,189 net market price of 1,189 net 148,625,000 won through nine times, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, from May 22, 2009, as well as from around 40 networked 1,189.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness F and N;
1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel by the settlement statement, the settlement statement, the settlement contract for the settlement of settlement of settlement, the contract for the settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of settlement of
1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion and defense counsel did not pay the price of self-surfing in the main transaction of M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "K") in M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "M"), which was the main transaction of M Co., Ltd. operated by the victim, and they did not pay the price of self-surfing in the previous M.