1. The Defendant indicated in the attached Form 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 6 of the attached Form 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, and

1. Basic facts

A. On February 12, 1991, the Plaintiff, as a broker of D, concluded a sales contract using the land (a) section 185 square meters in the name of the Plaintiff’s trust to purchase the instant building in the name of KRW 50,000,00,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00.

B. After the registration of the vice branch branch of the Daegu District Court and the registration of the preservation of ownership in the name of G was completed on March 12, 1992 as of March 12, 1992, on the entire land of this case, the ownership of the entire land of this case was transferred to H, I, II, J, and III in succession. On May 6, 2005, K completed the registration of the transfer of ownership for the entire land of this case to the Defendant on March 30, 2005.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 2-1-4, witness D's testimony, the whole purport of pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the statute of limitations for the possession of the instant land was completed on February 12, 201 by occupying the instant land in peace and openly and openly from February 12, 1991 to February 20, 201, by purchasing the entire instant land.

B. Determination 1 does not exist in light of social norms because a building cannot exist regardless of its site, the land which became the site of the building shall be deemed to be possessed by the owner of the building, and in this case the owner of the building.