1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The National Labor Relations Commission between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor on June 29, 2016.

1. The grounds for the court’s reasoning of the judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case are as follows: (a) the court of first instance admitting “the intervenor” as the intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “the intervenor joining the Defendant”) as “the intervenor joining the Defendant”; and (b) the second judgment of the court of first instance

D. In light of the following circumstances, Article 8(2) of the judgment of the court of first instance and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 8(2) (hereinafter “the first instance court’s 6th 5th 5th 9th 10th 10th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 5th 6th 5th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 2015).

However, the actual age that can reflect the physical and mental ability of workers.