1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 422,477,210 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 823,90 to Plaintiff B; and each of them, from March 24, 2015 to October 2016.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project name: A public announcement of project approval and announcement of C development project: The defendant; D public announcement of Gyeongnam-do on September 5, 2013; and E public announcement of 3 project operator on May 29, 2014;

B. Decision 1 rendered by the Gyeongnam-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee for the expropriation of a parcel number of land in the sequence of land subject to expropriation (Fri-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun), Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B 1 G 56, the lot number of land owned by the Plaintiff B 56, 22,569 1/2 - 3 I forest 8,430 1/2,587 - 13,587 - 13,587 - 5 K 4,165 1/2 6,65 - 6,645 1/2- 7 M forest - 1/498 - 56,950 (a total of each of the above land subject to expropriation referred to as “each of the instant land”, and a parcel number shall be set as the parcel number when a part of the land is referred to.

(2) The date of adjudication on expropriation: January 27, 2015: The date of commencement of expropriation: March 23, 2015: Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the column for “amount of adjudication on expropriation” in the attached Form 1 compensation details.

(Appraisal) 5 Appraisal Corporation: A national appraisal corporation, a third-party appraisal corporation, a corporation.

C. As a result of the instant court’s appraisal, compensation for each of the instant lands based on the result of the commission of appraisal to the Japanese appraisal corporation (hereinafter “court appraisal”) by the Japanese appraisal corporation (hereinafter “court appraisal”) is as indicated in the “court appraisal amount” column in the attached Form 1.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 13 (if there are serial numbers, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the result of the commission of appraisal to the Japanese Appraisal Corporation Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Court Appraiser"), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The land of this case is buried with raw stone with enormous value. The adjoining land is already used as N's stone collection grounds, so it is possible to obtain permission to collect earth and stones on each of the land of this case, so the value of raw stone affects the price of the land.

Therefore, each of the instant cases.