beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,00,000 and each of the said money to Plaintiff A from August 1, 2013.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts of recognition 1) The defendant is the defendant's vehicle D and Eunstunched vehicle (hereinafter "the defendant vehicle").
A) On August 1, 2013, F entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the following. (2) On August 1, 2013, at around 03:35, F, while driving a road near the mountain village in the area of the ancient west-gun, the right line for the central separation was shocked and stopped in the direction of 9:0 p.m. on the one-lane.
At this time, HNuvia car (Ma2) driven by G driving one-lane in the same direction was received from the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle as the front part of the left side of the vehicle, and the Defendant vehicle was 6 cc in the direction of 6 cc due to its shock, and the J R R Russ car (Ma3) driven by G was received the front part of the Defendant vehicle as the front part of the driving seat.
(3) At the time of the instant accident, Plaintiff A entered the back seat of the Defendant’s vehicle along with Plaintiff B, C, a large mother couple (D, K), and a mother couple (F, L) who is the child of the son of the son, the son and wife of the son and wife of the son and the son and wife of the son and wife of the son and the son and wife of the son, and it is unclear whether the Plaintiffs were wearing the safety belt at the time of the instant accident. (4) At the time of the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered from the son’s wife’s wife’s wife of the son and the son’s wife’s wife’s wife of the son and the son’s wife’s wife’s wife’s son and the son’s son’s wife of the son.
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 4, 8, Eul evidence 2, the purport of the whole pleadings]
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as an insurer.
C. Although it is unclear how the initial accident occurred, the limitation of liability is limited to the defendant's liability in light of the background of the accident, the relationship between the plaintiffs and F, the purpose of operation and the situation of accompanying the operation, etc., and the plaintiff A did not wear the safety belt and urge the safety driving properly.