beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant, in the case of D entertainment tavern operated by the victim C in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he received the money from the victim even if he received the money, but did not have the intent or ability to pay it. However, the defendant, by deceiving the victim five times through the following five times, did not pay the price, thereby taking profits equivalent to the same amount as the victim did not pay it, and received the total amount of KRW 150,000,000.
1. On May 13, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would pay the alcohol value after drinking to the victim at the construction site of the Gwangju High-Tech, Gwangju High-Tech, Gwangju High-dong Government Office.” Even though the Defendant was provided by the victim with alcohol, etc. equivalent to KRW 150,000, it did not pay the price.
2. On May 14, 2008, the Defendant provided alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 400,000 with the victim around 21:00, and did not pay the amount to the victim, and the Defendant shall repay the amount to the victim in a lump sum up to the credit value by lending KRW 100,00 to the victim.
“Around May 16, 2008, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 from the victim. The Defendant received KRW 360,000 from the victim on May 16, 2008, and did not pay the amount. The Defendant received KRW 50,000 from the victim on a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make a full payment of the amount of credit and the amount of credit borrowed from the victim in addition to the amount of KRW 50,00.” The Defendant received KRW 50,000 from the victim.
4. On May 18, 2008, the Defendant provided alcohol equivalent to KRW 100,000 from the victim, etc. on or around May 18, 2008, but the Defendant did not pay the amount by making a false statement to the effect that “I did not know that there was an increase in monthly salary, but would have been repaid at once both the credit amount and the credit amount borrowed at the monthly salary and the credit amount.”
5. The Defendant around 21:00 on May 20, 2008 KRW 240,000 from the victim.