logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.06 2015고단3848
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall pay 15 million won to an applicant for compensation.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months to commit fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the execution of the above sentence was terminated on July 20, 2012. On May 21, 2014, the above court was sentenced to one year of suspended execution for four months as a crime of fraud, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on February 5, 2015.

1. On June 20, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C that “The Defendant would have a child care facility in the E-family apartment in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and 101 will be tendered.”

However, the above apartment nursery facilities at the time was not announced publicly, and even if the defendant receives money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to receive the above nursery facilities from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the above victim, received 20 million won from the above victim to the account in the name of the Defendant under the pretext of bidding and introduction.

2. Around July 23, 2013, the Defendant, “Around July 23, 2015 Highest 5281, the Defendant,” made a false statement to the victim F that “A notary public, a notary public, who was boomed in the Southern-si Gaba Movement 101, would be able to operate a childcare center on commission of occupants’ representatives in the G Apartment-si management dong, Namyang-si, and would request the occupants’ representatives to pay KRW 30 million of the development fund to be paid to them.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not enter into a contract for the entrustment of the above apartment occupant representative and the childcare center, and there was no intention to entrust the above victim with the operation of the childcare center, and it was difficult to carry out the economic situation of the real estate consulting office operated by the defendant at

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the above victim, received KRW 30 million from the above victim at that time, and acquired it by fraud.

3. On January 2014, the Defendant posted a notice on the “H that comprehensively manages the sale and purchase, employment, etc. of child care centers” on the website of “H”.

arrow