1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant: (a) KRW 845,209,710 for the Plaintiff and its related expenses from March 21, 2013 to January 2016.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are as follows: (a) deleted the “amount to increase” of the second page 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance; (b) with respect to “20,941 square meters” in the third page 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) with respect to “20,941 square meters” in the fourth page 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the “this court” in the fourth page 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as “the court of first instance”; and (d) with respect to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, it is identical to that of paragraph (

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is obligated to pay the amount claimed to the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff completed the excavation investigation of each cultural heritage in accordance with the C-Japan service contract and E-Japan service contract and submitted each evidence of settlement to the Defendant.

B. 1) In full view of the following circumstances, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff’s evidence of the settlement of accounts is reliable, taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the facts acknowledged as above and the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 16, 17, 20, 21, 31, and 32 (including paper numbers) as to the cause of the claim. Thus, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the balance computed by deducting the amount paid to the Plaintiff from the final settlement amount calculated pursuant to the attached Form Nos. 1 and 2 based on the above evidence of the settlement of accounts, and delay damages therefor. (A) According to Article 4(1) of the C-Japan service contract and E-Japan service contract (hereinafter “each service contract of this case”), the required budget statement is effective as contract documents at the time of payment of the completed amount, and the detailed statement of the expenses for the settlement of accounts directly from the Defendant’s budget and the amount of the final settlement of accounts as stated in the attached Form C excavation service contract.