logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.09.12 2014고정131
강제추행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

At around 00:10 on November 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim E (e.g., 30 years of age) who passed through the passage at the main point in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) discovered the victim E (e.g., f., 30 years of age); and (c) committed indecent act by force on the part of the victim’s right bank and the part on the part below.

Judgment

There is a statement in the victim's court and investigative agency as evidence corresponding to the facts charged.

However, the defendant consistently asserts that there is no indecent act by force against the victim while driving in the main passage of the victim.

However, in the court, the witness F, the main operator of the situation at the time, argued that ① under the influence of alcohol, the victim was fluencing down to the table, ② when the defendant went to the toilet, the victim was seated in the table, ③ when the defendant went to the toilet, the victim was flucated, but there was no physical contact with the victim, but there was no physical contact with the victim. ④ After 20 to 30 minutes, the victim argued that the victim was forced to engage in indecent act by indecent act, and that the victim was flucated, and that the victim was flucated at this time, and that the victim was flucated at the time when she was flucatedd with the table. In this case, the victim was flucated and was flucatedd with the indecent act at the time of coming to the toilet.

was stated that it had been made.

In addition, the witness G, who is the defendant's one-way witness G, stated in the court that when the defendant's one-way witness G entered the main place, the victim was drunk because he was frightd to the table B, and that the victim was forced to commit indecent act by force. ② After that time, the victim argued that the victim was forced to commit indecent act by force, and that the victim was the victim's one-way witness G, stating that he was the victim's other person who was not the defendant.

In the court, the victim was first selected another person who is not the defendant as the perpetrator, and the victim was denied the fact of indecent act by force.

arrow