logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.07.23 2013고단2506
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On December 28, 2006, the Defendant is the owner of A truck, and around 06:51 on December 28, 2006, the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by operating the said vehicle in a state where the vehicle is loaded with a weight exceeding 10 tons in front of the New Anthradial Control Inspection Station of the Korea Highway, even though it is restricted to operate more than 10 tons.36 tons.

2. The judgment prosecutor, applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; a fine of 300,000 won was finalized due to a summary order subject to review, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article, even the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article, since the Article 208Hun-Ga17, which was July 30, 2009, retroactively loses its effect by the decision of the Constitutional Court, the facts charged in this case shall not be a crime.

arrow