A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with a more flabbr.

1. On June 1, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (if the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 14:45 on June 1, 2018, driving the said car with a alcohol concentration of 0.359%, and then driving the said car at the seat of D Hospital C in the following City City: (a) driving the said car at the seat of the registry office, one-lane of the three-lanes between the two-lanes.

A person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to pay attention to changing the vehicle line by operating a direction direction when changing the vehicle line and giving prior notice of the change of course and taking into account the traffic conditions before and after the change.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in changing the course as it is without operation, such as direction direction, while under the influence of alcohol, and is proceeding two lanes in the same direction.

The front part of the F-city bus driving by E was shocked to the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed the bus owned by the victim benefitingsan passenger, which was owned by the victim, to use approximately KRW 1,452,506 for repair costs, such as the exchange of all-on-line bus, and escaped without taking necessary measures as a driver.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driving a vehicle with a alcohol concentration of 0.359% at the border of the day specified in paragraph (1) on the road front of the Southern Kungsan movable restaurant located in the same city (D hospital located in C) at the same city via the road front of the D Hospital located in the same city at the same city via the same city at a three-distance road, such as yellow dust on the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Notice of the result of regulating the driving of alcohol, report on the situation of the driver in charge, response to a request for appraisal, and alcohol appraisal in the blood;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on a yellow survey report and a written estimate;

1. The relevant Article of the Act and the traffic law of choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;