beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2] On February 7, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, who was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, on February 15, 2013. On March 24, 2016, the judgment became final and conclusive on April 1, 2016, which was sentenced to a two-year imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 6, 2016, with respect to the criminal facts committed between November 5, 2013 and January 20, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 14, 2016. However, each of the above criminal records was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of one year for imprisonment at the Gwangju District Court, and the Defendant did not have committed the instant crime after February 15, 2013, each of which became final and conclusive on February 15, 2013.
[Criminal facts]
1. On September 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A victim B engaged in a domestic construction business, who purchased more than 1,500,000 won on the face of money, and leased it to the victim B, thereby changing KRW 1,50,000 as a monthly profit.”
However, in fact, the defendant received money from the victim at the time and planned to use it for personal purposes such as repayment of the victim's debt, etc., and even if the defendant received money from the victim from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 15 million in total to the NongHyup Bank account under the name of the defendant from the victim, which was around September 28, 2010, and KRW 15 million around October 29 of the same year.
2. On May 201, the Defendant transferred to the Victim B, “B” in the French land not exceeding Gwangju, Gwangju.
Since the lease project is not well-grounded, it makes a false statement to the effect that it would purchase other construction machinery to carry on the business.
However, the defendant at the time of damage.