A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 23:10 on July 27, 2014, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 2823,” committed assault to the above E on the ground that: (a) the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the said district, was carrying the Defendant on patrols to have the Defendant returned to the said district and carried the Defendant on patrols to have the Defendant returned from the patrols; and (b) the Defendant returned to the said district on the ground that the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the said district, was unable to find the Defendant at the patrols; and (c) was able to walk back from the patrols; and (d) was able to walk off E’s ships and buckbucks, and thereby interfere with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers’ order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] : The scope of comparative sentence between the punishment and the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the same kind [No person who has been specially punished] (6 months to 1 year and 4 months): June 1, 200; the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the same kind; the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the same kind; the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the same kind; the punishment of the punishment of the police officer who intends to rescue

It takes into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and other factors of sentencing as stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 51 of the Criminal Act.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 13:25 on March 4, 2015, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire from the “I” convenience store operated by the victim H in the Gu-si G on the part of the Government-Si on March 13:25, 2015; (b) one time in which the victim’s right knife is knife, and the victim reported 112.