The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, at the time of the misunderstanding of the fact, was deprived of the vehicle due to the sloping ice, and forced to sloping the central line while leaving the sloping, and thus, the Defendant’s fault is not recognized, and the Defendant’s vehicle is subscribed to the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance, and thus, the prosecution of the facts charged of this case should be dismissed.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving a car at Cenz.

On December 5, 2015, the Defendant operated the said benz car at a speed or method that impedes other people by accurately operating the steering gear, brakes and other devices, and operated the said benz car at the seat of the New Middle School located in Yong-si, Yong-si, and G at the New High School located in G, which is about 80 meters away from the above E E’s building. On the basis of the Defendant’s running direction, the above bencing section was opened to the left side immediately connected. In such a case, the driver is prohibited from driving the vehicle at a speed or method that impedes other people according to road traffic conditions and the structure and performance of the vehicle, and the Defendant did not accurately operate the steering gear and steering the benz at a speed or method that impedes the above fencing part of the vehicle while driving the vehicle with the hand-on of the said benz at the direction of the victim’s front benc.

3...