Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 7, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 19:20 on July 7, 2020, she spited the victim D ( South Korea, 18 years old) before the victim D (in front of the victim who she was getting off and proceeding with the above Otoba on the ground of rapid operation of the Obaba in front of the victim; (b) as a result, the victim was spiting the victim’s face, and assaulted the victim by spiting the victim’s clothes in good hands.

2. On July 7, 2020, around 19:57, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, the Defendant was unable to fright the road before the “F gas station” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Seoul, and caused the disturbance by taking a bath, etc. Around 112, the Nonindicted Party sent to the site upon receiving a report and sent the Defendant to the scene by guiding the Defendant as India, and the Nonindicted Party H called the said Inspector H to “I fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright.

G The chest 1 was fluored by the fluor of the G G 1's chest fluor with the fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made to I and H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (work log and 112 report processing statements), investigation reports (in the face of crimes -CCTV, and evidence collected);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that there is no criminal history against the defendant, and the crime of this case is committed by the birth of acute symptoms during the sporactic medication due to a sporactic disorder between several years.